I recently launched a free, open, public online petition to call attention to an itsy-bitsy easy-to-fix structural inadequacy in the book trade that is holding back independent work. A problem of a sort commonly improved. (I presented another petition to "free the book" in the previous MR.)
To make a long pitch short, I suggest the term INDEPENDENT be added to the list of categories used to describe and label books within the trade. Categories are short lists of keywords entered into online tagging/search systems. They are also printed on the back covers of books in the corners. They are commonly combined: "Fiction/Literature," "Sports/Fishing/Essays," etc. "Independent" could have a big effect just by being an extra tag added; in some stores this designation could get its own shelf, if desired.
Taking control of your label is an obviously powerful move. Consider FREE TRADE coffee, or ORGANICALLY grown, or FREE-RANGE chicken!
This is not an angry fix but simple common sense!
So please feel free, no matter where you stand upon the literary spectrum, and lend your signature to a RAISED PROFILE FOR INDY LIT making it more justly labeled and thus easier to find and viable. And PROUDLY, like indy music and indy film, with its own category indy lit would finally make a NAME for itself!
In the meantime, in the upcoming novels (for Wild Bill Blackolive) I've just gone and DONE SO MYSELF! ...And I'll be printing the "Independent" category on all my ULA PRESS book covers from now on!
To: Readers, Writers, Publishers, the Book Trade...and Amazon!
We, the undersigned, declare that the publishing world should recognize the category "Independent" in its list of book categories.
Music and film have an "independent" category—it's time for books to have the same option!
Thankfully, this is an easy fix---new categories are ADDED ALL THE TIME.
Today, an independent book has little hope of larger success, of being reviewed or distributed on its own merits.
Having such a label could make all the difference!
For the most part the pariah status has fallen to literary writing. But in many other fields as well an independent book is handicapped. Its main asset—its independence—is a liability only as long as this quality is ignored! An indy book submitted to the media for review almost always is ignored, rejected out-of- hand because of its indy status and not "worthy" of mention. Today, the less indy is a book the more likely it is to be reviewed and stocked in a store. The more deals and concessions a writer or publisher makes with corporations on every level, the more likely the book is admitted into the Market. Because the indy aspect per se is never considered an asset—it is not even mentionable or listed! But, take heart, with a label comes leverage!
So: let's give indy publishing its name!
The contrast is remarkable—independent music and film have their own feature columns in various major media, and are readily "flagged" and found in all searcheable category-lists, but independent publishing has nothing! Time for independent publishing to get at least that much respect and public access!
If independent publishing makes A NAME FOR ITSELF, it might just break through!
In the book trade, a big advertising budget, an established publisher, a credentialed author (i.e., part of the system) and a mainstream distributor are all required conditions for review and stocking in stores. The indy press predictably lacks all these things. Yet the indy press publishes many of the best books overall. Which then sink into oblivion except for a few cult insider fans.
In contrast, what does indy publishing have going for it? Nothing but authenticity—nothing but its OWN NAME. So, let's start using it! And let's first employ that indy label where it counts most.
Thank heaven this is an easy fix commonly done throughout the culture, as the categories list is constantly being expanded anyway. (Think ORGANIC produce, FREE-TRADE coffee, FREE-RANGE chicken.)
Furthermore, bias against independent, DIY media based on "where it comes from" is as outdated in today's Internet-age as it has been always ignorant. Good grief, BLOGS get more respect today than the independent press does! So, to the entire book trade: DROP THE BIAS! Drop the attitude! We're here to help with this simple suggestion. And this petition.
Categories, after all, are short lists of keywords entered into online tagging/search systems. They are also printed on the back covers of books, in the corners. And they are commonly combined: "Fiction/Literature," "Sports/Fishing/Essays," etc. "Independent" would be another extra tag or category and could get its own shelf, if a store desired.
Independent writers and publishers have long had to make their way outside the System. Often they do quite well, relying on the direct access to specialized audiences and target markets. But the result is that there are two separate publishing worlds in our society—one is mentioned frequently in public media, well- reviewed, and stocked in general-interest bookstores—the other is segregated and marginalized in specialty niche ghettos.
The situation is far worse for the general interest and mainstream literary field: here there is no specialized audience, by definition. Yet the independent voice has what the general public needs! That voice is prevented from accessing this audience! And the audience is, in turn, kept away from it! By using the "independent" label (or having a search engine do it for you) anyone will be able, for the first time, to find the independent voices of our diverse society.
It's like back when African American music first gave a folk life to the cities of America—it wasn't reviewed, considered or aired on the radio. It was big, yet it was as if it didn't exist. Getting down with a name is the first step toward revival!
One reason why the book trade makes pariahs of independents is that the Industry prides itself on an IMAGE of independence. But the corporate and academic literary establishments have many concerns other than merit, while merit is the only standard for independents. Marketing, career, credentials, and legal concerns, like image itself, all take precedence. Tawdriness and conformity are just two results of the dominance of corporate and academic values. Values which (rightly) emphasize systemization and orderliness. Beholden media have their uses, but they are simply not the places to look for the best and most relevant art...or art that has any independence and in turn respects its audience.
Refusing to grant someone a name is a way of making them "disappear." Why would anyone want to prevent an alternative sort of literature? Because independent literature is a threat to captive literature!
But the only hope for popularity of literature again in this country, of any kind, corporate or not, emanates from the "independent" field. A domain where artforms always gather energy. This provides for the greatness that corporations then spin out into product-lines and which academics study.
Amazon and Google have had viable effects on independent media. But we say that they need to take this further step. "Independent" signals diverse, inclusive values that can be sought on its own merit or noted as an add-on feature. It's a label that says "This book has no strings attached." Though books flagged with this new tag might seem to be unrelated on the surface, they will soon be seen to have much in common.
Grandly, there's no need to wait for anyone's permission to make this happen! Starting NOW, the ULA PRESS is printing "Literature / Independent" on back covers in the category-label corner. (See http://ulapress.com.) Join us today! We of the Alliance welcome anyone, everyone, to add the "Independent" flag to their own list!