|
Literary Life Without Oprah Jonathan Franzen Is Ambivalent About, Well, Everything
"The Corrections" earned Jonathan Franzen a National Book Award last year, though his comments surrounding its success brought him scathing criticism. His new work, "How to Be Alone," however, is another story. (File Photo/ Stuart Ramson -- AP)
By Lorraine Adams Special to The Washington Post Tuesday, November 19, 2002; Page C01
NEW YORK -- The reclamation of Jonathan Franzen is underway. In the year since he dissed Oprah and got dinged for it, the 43-year-old novelist has made some modest adjustments, and so have his critics.
Labeled an "ego-blinded snob" in the Boston Globe, he told Charlie Rose recently that he is "less worried" -- about everything. The reviews of his new collection of essays, "How to Be Alone," have been downright kindly. Cleveland Plain Dealer book editor Karen Sangstrom declared the book has won her back from "disdain."
Setbacks have loomed, then toppled. The New York Post in August tried to gin up scandal over Franzen's acceptance of a $20,000 grant from the National Endowment for the Arts. (Rich writer gets $20G cookie! Taxpayer dollars wasted!) It turned out he had applied for the grant before "The Corrections," his acclaimed novel of a Midwestern family, had been published, let alone sold more than a million copies. Only the Underground Literary Alliance, a group of Philadelphia writers seeking the "overthrow of the literary establishment," picked up on the story and encouraged protest. So far, no picketing.
It hasn't hurt that "The Corrections" in hardcover has been a runaway bestseller in Europe this fall. Or that the softcover edition has topped paperback lists from coast to coast in the United States.
And, as if to prove that his misgivings about Oprah Winfrey choosing "The Corrections" for her talk show book club are completely gone, he appeared on morning television with Katie Couric in July and christened Adam Haslett's "You Are Not a Stranger Here" a "Today" show book club selection. That Oprah logo he worried about on his book? Thanks to Franzen, the "Today" logo is on Haslett's.
There are those who wonder about his adjustments. They find his concerns about where his novel will end up in literary hierarchies unseemly, like getting stressed over whether your infant will make it into Harvard. "Franzen has the most dire case of literary status-anxiety that I have ever seen," says Leon Wieseltier, literary editor of the New Republic. "He demeans his own seriousness with his flurries of positioning."
Others are more positive. "This is someone whose work is galvanized by his own contradictions, his own warring instincts," says Henry Finder, editorial director of the New Yorker, who has known Franzen since 1994. "He's both fascinated and repelled by technology. He wrote an elegant essay about how sex scenes can't be written, and yet he wrote a novel that has strenuously alive sex scenes. He wonders whether the novel matters to the culture. And then he writes a novel that clearly does matter to the culture. It's as if he sets himself up to defy the cultural laws of gravity."
Status and anxiety figure prominently in his recent essay in the New Yorker on novelist William Gaddis ("Carpenter's Gothic," "JR"). In it, Franzen divides novelists into two camps: "Status" authors see difficulty as a signal of excellence that "the author has disdained cheap compromise and stayed true to an artistic vision." "Contract" writers want to entertain and connect with readers. This, Franzen says, is what he is. He then confesses, "I have started (in many cases, more than once) 'Moby-Dick,' 'The Man Without Qualities,' 'Mason & Dixon,' 'Don Quixote,' 'Remembrance of Things Past,' 'Doctor Faustus,' 'Naked Lunch,' 'The Golden Bowl' and 'The Golden Notebook' without coming anywhere near finishing them." Difficult books, he says, are no longer what he aspires to write.
Status and anxiety also are constant companions throughout "How to Be Alone." Eleven of its 13 essays are autobiographical. Two are reported pieces of journalism. "Lost in the Mail," about the Chicago Post Office, was his first New Yorker piece. "Control Units," about a maximum-security prison in Colorado, first appeared in Details magazine.
The personal essays range through his father's struggle with Alzheimer's, his first high school job, his smoking habit, giving away his television, moving to New York, scavenging for furniture in alleys, and the so-called Harper's essay, which wondered whether novels could matter in an age of images. In his earlier essays there is an angry young man comically convinced that television will rot him and everyone else. He is disturbed by SUVs, suburbs, leaf blowers, Pentium chips and the Blockbuster Bowl.
Throughout "How to Be Alone," Franzen evinces an anxiety that is best summed up in the essay "Books in Bed," which is an extended riff on volumes such as "The Ten Commandments of Pleasure" by Susan Bloch. "I have no objection to a nice bra, still less to being invited to remove one," Franzen writes. "But brothelware of the kind sold at Frederick's of Hollywood seems to me scarcely less hokey than a Super Bowl halftime show. What I feel when I hear that the mainstream actually buys this stuff is the same garden-variety alienation I feel on learning Hootie & the Blowfish sold thirteen million copies of their first record, or that the American male's dream date is Cindy Crawford. In a sense, I'm proud of not being like everybody else. Like everybody else, though, I'm anxious about sex, and with sex the recognition that I'm not like everybody else leads directly to the worry that I'm not as good as -- or, at any rate, not having as much fun as -- everybody else. . . . I want to be alone, but not too alone. I want to be the same but different."
There is something of this desire in Franzen's two-room apartment above a real estate office on Manhattan's Upper East Side. The third-floor walk-up is an incongruity of color and non-style. It fairly announces, I refuse the value system of George Stephanopoulos in Architectural Digest, I renounce downtown lofts of stainless steel and Young British Art. There is a fading red Chinese silk rug from his now-deceased Midwestern parents, two techno-green square paintings resembling microscope slides of algae, two rawhide sculptures that look like bongo drums, three scavenged public school chairs and a sun-bleached swivel chair found in an alley.
The only concessions to stylishness are two Crate & Barrel purchases -- a burgundy sofa in matte leather and a gold floral easy chair. But they don't even go with each other, let alone anything else. In the year since "The Corrections" made him a millionaire, these are the only new pieces of furniture he has bought for the apartment he has rented for the past eight years. He says he has no plans to move.
"I feel ambivalent about things," Franzen says. "I feel caught between narratives everywhere I turn. Am I a Midwesterner? Am I an Easterner? My parents were totally different people in my life. Am I like my mom? Am I like my dad? Am I a social novelist, or am I sort of an old-fashioned domestic novelist? Do I feel comfortable being an isolated individual or do I crave acceptance? Do I want the comforts of being cool or the comforts of being part of the mass? . . . In my initial relations with the media last fall, that gave rise to this tremendous confusion. Because, I think, although I'm not sure, that people want you to be one thing or another."
Franzen has learned to be at least one thing in his interviews -- a sensitive and gentle guy. His book tour is winding down without incident. It's time, once again, to write a novel.
"I have a very thick sheaf of notes. The writing goes very, very fast and is so fun and is over so quickly," he says. "It's sort of tragically short compared to the difficulty of finding the tone and the right story to tell. That's a matter of a kind of Socratic dialogue with oneself. You know right away if it doesn't work. You can tell the next morning. And I'm at the stage where nothing works. But that's how it is. In some ways it's gratifying to find that I'm not happy with most things I write."
© 2002 The Washington Post Company
|
|